Will pesticide law enforcement be caught in the trade talks | New
(Washington) — The United States is talking with several countries as part of an emerging framework for Exchange policyand in the Midwest, there are concerns about the ripple effect on farmers and consumers when it comes to pesticides.
The Indo-Pacific economic framework involves more than a dozen countries and is based on four negotiating pillars, including decarbonization and the fight against corruption.
Steve Suppan, senior policy analyst at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, said while there are motivations to stray from standard business ideals, the influence of big agribusiness could further complicate matters. Pesticides are one of them.
“Some of the IPEF countries have pesticide policies that disallow US imports containing pesticide residues on horticulture and grain exports,” Suppan observed.
He predicted this would lead to calls for the elimination of “zero tolerance” policies, with companies saying they would disrupt food delivery. It is also feared that the discussions will take place behind closed doors.
The Pesticide Action Network said the United States already has lax pesticide rules and states like Iowa do not strictly enforce existing guidelines, impacting farmer health and food safety. .
Rob Faux, communications manager for the network, who also owns a farm in Iowa, said the United States and its agricultural sector had become too used to reliance on pesticides.
“We’ve gotten to the point where we’re jaded,” Faux argued. “‘It’s just a pesticide, and we use it all the time.’ “
False pointed to a proposal to Congress, the Protecting America’s Children from Toxic Pesticides Act, as a way to incorporate incremental improvements. He argued this would give regulators more teeth to keep harmful products off the market.
“It would change the process of registering both, making it a bit more difficult, a bit more burden of proof to show it’s safe,” Faux suggested. “And then removing the chemical if it shows there are dangers and issues with it would become easier”
Although the bill’s future is uncertain, proponents say it also protects local governments and their ability to pass their own pesticide rules. Some members of Congress fought against a patchwork of regulations.